By Jolene Bulambot
Visayas Bureau
Last updated 07:14pm (Mla time) 06/16/2007
CEBU CITY, Cebu — A municipal trial court in cities judge in Cebu City has bared an
alarming case of illicit wedding coordination business at the Marcelo Fernan Hall of Justice here allegedly involving a fellow MTCC judge and a court staff.
Judge Donato Navarro, presiding judge of MTCC-Cebu Branch 6, has also asked the Supreme Court to immediately investigate the allegations “to protect the image and credibility of the judiciary.”
Navarro alleged that one of his court stenographers, Corazon Retuya, connived with a fellow judge in making a business out of officiating marriages in the city courts by charging from P1,000 to P 8,000 when the marriage fee should only be P300.
He said the charge would even higher, from P15,000 to P100,000, if the union involves a Filipina marrying a foreigner.
In a press conference Friday afternoon, Navarro has also called on the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) to condemn the “marriage coordination scam” and for concerned authorities to put a stop to the alleged irregularity.
“I call on the members of the legal community particularly the Integrated Bar of the Philippines to condemn the marriage coordination scam because it has affected not only the image but also the credibility of the judiciary. They are making millions out of this private business and this must be stopped,” he said.
Navarro, who was recently barred by the Supreme Court to preside over hearings and was instead ordered to concentrate on deciding the almost 2,000 pending cases in his court, made this allegation in his 48-page accomplishment report that he submitted to the High Tribunal two weeks ago.
The High Tribunal has stripped Navarro of some judicial and administrative functions after his staff filed administrative charges against him for, among others, neglect of duty and oppression.
Navarro said the complaints against him were fabricated and has asked the High Tribunal to dismiss the charges filed against him.
He also asked the Supreme Court to impose administrative sanctions against the court officials and staff who would be found to have been violating the law.
“The public has the right to know about the corrupt practices in the judiciary because they deserve the right justice. In my court, there has been a marriage coordination scam that has been going on for several years. I only learned of this when I discovered hundreds of these marriage certificates performed by a current judge. This judge is in collaboration (with) my court stenographer,” he alleged.
Attached to Navarro’s report were photocopies of some 408 marriage certificates performed during the last eight months of 2003 for a fee of P1,500 each, or a total of P612,000.
Retuya and her young daughter, Celeste, allegedly filled up the marriage certificates, Navarro claimed.
“The applications even show how much (Corazon) Retuya charges to coordinate the application of license from a low of P 1,500 to a high of P6,000 or more. In some of them, it even shows that this fee is divided among the guard, some court staff, and the judge,” he said.
The older Retuya denied the allegations, saying Navarro was making false accusations against her out of vindictiveness. However, she refused to comment further saying she would wait the action from the Supreme Court.
MTCC-Cebu Executive Judge Oscar Andrino, who presides over Branch 5, also declined to be interviewed when the Inquirer sought his comment.
But a Branch 5 staff who asked not to be named said Andrino would be calling a meeting among city judges next week and would include in the agenda the allegation raised by Navarro.
Navarro said he judge involved in the scam has earned the monicker “the marrying judge” because she performed an average of two marriages a day.
The same judge, Navarro claimed, even performed marriages in other cities no longer under her jurisdiction.
The Inquirer is withholding the name of the judge pending her comment. Several attempts to reach the judge in her courtroom where she was scheduled to officiate a wedding at 6 p.m. proved futile.
Navarro in his complaint added that because of the alleged connivance between the judge and his stenographer, Branch 6 has also earned the reputation as the “marrying court” and has been referred to as a church rather than as a court.
He also requested authority from the Supreme Court to seize any and all documents within his court including those locked in the drawers so he could forward them to the High Tribunal for evaluation.
“It is very obvious that some complainants, in praying for the removal of their superiors, may have filed this case in order to escape sanctions themselves, as some of them are guilty of offenses for which they may be dismissed,” he said.
Navarro has also asked the Supreme Court to require the executive judge to coordinate or enter into a memorandum of agreement with the Local Civil Registrar so that marriage contracts would be furnished to the court exclusively through the Office of the Clerk of Court.
“The undersigned believes that (by) simply having the Local Civil Registrar release marriage contracts supplied to the courts through only the Clerk of Court, to be released only upon payment of the P300 marriage fee, will do wonders in stopping (the) illicit business. This will at least make them aware that this is all that they have to pay since an official receipt has to be issued,” he said.