
Fixing education flaws By Fernando del Mundo
Inquirer
Last updated 03:44am (Mla time) 06/06/2007
(Last of three parts)
Read Part 1: Education crisis deepens
Read Part 2: Fixing education flaws: Textbooks shot through with errors
MANILA, Philippines — Officials of private high schools in the provinces fear their days are numbered.
Concern centers on a government move to phase out the Educational Service Contracting (ESC) program hammered out with private high schools in the 1980s to help poor elementary graduates.
The ESC will then be replaced by the Educational Voucher System (EVS), if the Department of Education (DepEd) overcomes objections by private schools mainly run by the Catholic Church and religious groups.
Tested last year, the EVS will politicize the program and further erode the already dismal situation in Philippine education, critics say.
The ESC and EVS differ in the selection of schools and student recipients. In effect, the EVS will do away with the screening mechanism in place for almost a quarter of a century and lead to the demise of the so-called “non-elite” private high schools.
In a full-page newspaper ad taken out last month, the Davao Association of Colleges and Schools and the Coordinating Council of Private Educational Associations in Region 11 (Southern Mindanao) appealed to President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo to retain the ESC guidelines for the beneficiaries coming from 430,000 families nationwide.
The EVS conditions “do not only discriminate against private school students coming from indigent families but also cause the eventual closure of 1,970 participating private schools across the country,” the ad says.
Education Secretary Jesli Lapus scoffs at such claims, saying that, in fact, the plea was made by schools charging tuition of over P12,000 and they could hardly be classified as needy.
Increase in budget
“By the skin of my teeth, I have already gotten an increase in the budget,” says Lapus, raising the subsidy from P4,000 to P6,000 this year because students sent to private high schools were dropping out.
“They are ostracized. They have no pocket money. They have no uniforms. They have no textbooks,” says Lapus.
“I ask now, what is the counterpart of the private schools which are living on 40 percent of their revenues from the government. What are they contributing to the students?”
The ESC was implemented under a law passed in 1989 to decongest public high schools after the government’s free secondary education sparked massive transfers from privately operated facilities.
This was done after the Fund for Assistance to Private Education (FAPE) conducted a pilot project in the provinces of Samar, Leyte and Cotabato in school year 1982-83 and the result essentially became the ESC.
ESC financing came from the Government Assistance to Students and Teachers in Private Education (GASTPE) which, in the last school year, wangled P2 billion, including about P500 million for the EVS pilot project.
Private high schools had accounted for 60 percent of total enrollment in the 1970s. By the late 1980s, when the free high school education program came into effect, the figure had dropped further to 20 percent. A general economic crunch also triggered the exodus to public schools.
Way out of tight spot
Without the resources to deal with overcrowding, the DepEd went into service contracting, paying for surplus facilities in private high schools to accommodate Grade 6 graduates.
It was a way out of a tight spot.
Instead of building schools, putting in facilities and hiring teachers, the government adopted the ESC.
Each student got a subsidy that began with P900. By last year, the subsidy had gone up to P4,000. Experts say that getting the private sector to join the ESC had not been easy, especially after tuition had breached the P20,000 mark with the median rate at P7,000.
The Davao schools expressed disappointment at the EVS guidelines, including limiting to 40 the ESC freshmen grantees per participating school, disqualifying schools charging more than P12,000, excluding private elementary school graduates as beneficiaries, and allowing participation only of private schools that are close to red- or black-coded public high schools, meaning those in impoverished areas.
Why ESC appeals
Former Education Secretary Edilberto de Jesus outlines in a paper why the ESC appeals.
“For the EVS, [the] DepEd identified the schools qualified to receive the voucher certificates. Any school in the ‘red zone,’ areas where public high schools lacked classrooms or teachers, could participate in the EVS,” says De Jesus.
“In the schools eventually selected, through a process that remains somewhat vague, the principals selected 22 students belonging to the upper 50 percent of the graduating elementary class to receive the certificates.”
On the other hand, in the ESC, parents had to apply and commit to cover the gap between the subsidy and the school’s tuition, says De Jesus. School committees evaluate the applicants’ financial standing and academic ability.
Schools in the “red zone” had to pass the qualification standards of the FAPE, which administers the project for GASTPE grants. The FAPE also conducted training programs for ESC schools, assisted them in developing learning materials and monitored student performance.
Reinventing the wheel
“Taking money away from the ESC for a voucher system essentially duplicating what it is already doing is an exercise in reinventing the wheel,” says De Jesus.
The DepEd is determined to push ahead with the phase-out of the ESC, whose obvious appeal is in the flexibility it allows the administration in deciding where to distribute the vouchers.
It could serve the function of a Philippine Health Insurance Corp. (PhilHealth) card, says one critic, referring to the government initiative backed by P3 billion in funds from the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office and the Bureau of Internal Revenue, which were farmed out during the fraud-wracked presidential election in 2004.
Fait accompli
Mariano Piamonte, a member of the State Assistance Council chaired by the education secretary, says he received a “referendum” memo from the panel in March asking him to sign the adoption of voucher system and the phase-out of the contracting program.
He refused to sign the document, pointing out that he was being served a fait accompli. It was done without the benefit of debate in the council which is supposed to be convened at least once a year, he says.
The ECS is mandated by law enacted by Congress, Piamonte says. If it is changed by executive fiat, he is concerned that a new President will easily change its ground rules.
“We want the department to go back to the old system,” says Piamonte, who is also executive director of the Catholic Education Association of the Philippines. He says the Coordinating Council for Private Schools, the umbrella association for 3,000 schools belonging to various groups, is mobilizing to oppose the voucher system.
Lapus skates questions on Piamonte’s criticism. He admits that the mechanism could still be fine-tuned and emphasized that the more important thing was that with the increase in funding there will be more beneficiaries.
For now, the outlook doesn’t look too good for private school administrators.